Heterosis Studies in Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)
R. Lankesh Kumar1
Udaykumar Surendra Kage1
Deepa M. Madalageri2
1. Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad-580005, India
2. Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad-580005, India
International Journal of Horticulture, 2014, Vol. 4, No. 8 doi: 10.5376/ijh.2014.04.0008
Received: 24 Mar., 2014 Accepted: 09 Apr., 2014 Published: 21 Apr., 2014
© 2014 BioPublisher Publishing Platform
This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Preferred citation for this article:
Kumar et al., 2014, Heterosis Studies in Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.), International Journal of Horticulture, 2014, Vol.4, No.8 40-43 (doi: 10.5376/ijh.2014.04.0008)
The estimation of heterosis in 72 hybrids for yield and other 13 yield related component traits were studied following Line x tester design in chilli. Maximum heterosis (49.09%) for dry fruit yield per plant and fruit weight (21.70%) over standard check was observed in the cross Co-1x Byadagi dabbi and for plant height and number of primary branches the cross GPC-82xSinganahalli local. The hybrid Punjab LalxKDC-1 had more number of fruits per plant, while Puri redxLokur local and Puri redxKDC-1 were early for days to 50 per cent flowering. The hybrid G-3xVN-2 exhibited highest heterosis for fruit diameter and pericarp weight. For fruit length and number of seeds per fruit the cross Co-1xByadagi dabbi while, S-32xLokur local showed maximum standard heterosis for dry fruit yield per plant. The hybrids Co-1xByadagi dabbi (40.09%), Co-1 Lokur local (40.97%), G-3xLokur local (39.92%), Co-1xKDC-1 (36.10%), G-4xByadagi dabbi (34.19%) and Kunkaur-3xByadagi dabbi (32.66%) were considered most heterotic hybrids for yield and yield related components viz., number of secondary branches, number of fruit per plant, fruit length, fruit weight and pericarp weight.
International Journal of Horticulture
• Volume 4