Mosquito larvicidal potentiality of wild turmeric, Curcuma aromatica rhizome, extracts against Japanese Encephalitis vector Culex vishnui group  

Subrata Mallick1,2 , Kuntal Bhattacharya1 , Goutam Chandra1
1. Mosquito, Microbiology and Nanotechnology Research Units, Parasitology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan, West Bengal, India
2. Department of Zoology, Maharajadhiraj Uday Chand Women’s College, Burdwan, West Bengal, India
Author    Correspondence author
Journal of Mosquito Research, 2014, Vol. 4, No. 19   doi: 10.5376/jmr.2014.04.0019
Received: 04 Oct., 2014    Accepted: 27 Nov., 2014    Published: 03 Dec., 2014
© 2014 BioPublisher Publishing Platform
This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Preferred citation for this article:

Mallick et al., 2014, Mosquito larvicidal potentiality of wild turmeric, Curcuma aromatica rhizome, extracts against Japanese Encephalitis vector Culex vishnui group, Journal of Mosquito Research, Vol.4, No.19 1-6 (doi: 10.5376/jmr.2014.04.0019)


One of the promising ways to reduce mosquito population is the use of larvicide. Curcuma aromatica is a cosmetic herb in South Asia. The present study was conducted to explore the larvicidal effect of Curcuma aromatica rhizome extracts against the Culex vishnui group. To assess the larvicidal activity, crude extracts of rhizome of Curcuma aromatica were prepared ranging from 0.02% to 0.1% concentrations against all the instars of Cx. vishnui larvae. Active fractions were obtained by using six different solvents i.e. petroleum ether, n-hexane, ethyl acetate, chloroform: methanol (1:1 v/v), acetone, and absolute alcohol from non-polar to polar fashion. All the solvent extractives were tested against all the larval instars with graded concentrations ranging from 20 ppm to 100 ppm. Through log–probit analyses, LC50 and LC90 values were determined. Afterwards the statistical justifications were done by ANOVA analyses with reference to time, concentrations and larval instars as three entirely randomized autonomous variables. Furthermore the bioactive fraction was tested against non-target organisms under laboratory conditions. Maximum mortality was recorded in 0.1% concentrations of crude rhizome extracts against all the instars. Ethyl acetate extractives were found to have good larvicidal effect only among all the solvent extractives. The LC50 and LC90 values of 3rd instars larvae were 17.25 ppm and 78.02 ppm respectively after 72 h of post exposure.The non-responsiveness of the non-target populations towards extractives was also noticed. The rhizome extracts of Curcuma aromatica can be used as an alternative larvicide against the JE vector Cx. vishnui group.

Curcuma aromatica; Rhizome; Culex vishnui; larvicidal activity

Mosquitoes, the perilous vectors of diseases, belong to the family of small, midge-like flies, the Culicidae. Although a few species are harmless or even helpful to mankind, most of them are considered as nuisances. Over 3,500 species of mosquitoes have been described to date around the globe. Some are vectors of a number of infectious diseases affecting millions of people per year (Leisnham, 2013). Among these, Japanese Encephalitis (JE) is a dreadful ailment caused by JE viruswhich isprevalent in South East Asia and Far East. The reservoirs of this virus are domestic pigs and some wild birds. Approximately 3 billion people of the humanity live in this affected area. In JE-endemic Indian sub-continent more than 50,000 cases per year occur and the mortality rate is near 30% (Kabilan et al., 2004). Pragmatically the populations of rural localities are at higher risk than urban regions.

Culex vishnui group, vectors of JE, preferably breeds in water with plentiful vegetation like paddy fields
(Banerjee and Chandra, 2004), moreover shallow ditches, pools and rice cultivation sites.
Several synthetic insecticides have been applied but most of them are non-biodegradable and reported to be hazardous. Besides, the gradual increase of resistance towards chemical insecticides (WHO, 1992) led to the need of new insecticides from novel sources especially from botanical origin (Bhattacharya et al., 2014a, 2014b, Chowdhury et al., 2009).
Curcuma aromatica commonly known as wild turmeric is a member of the genus Curcuma belonging to the family Zingiberaceae. The perpetual shrubbery dies down in late autumn but the rhizomes remains latent. The inflorescence appears in early spring from the base of the rhizomes. Following immediate hot summer and rainy monsoon, the plant grows rapidly, upto 30-40 cm and is crowned with enlarged colouredbracts with pink tips. Leaves often appear subsequent to the flowers.
The rhizome extracts of Curcuma aromatica possess good anti-bacterial effect (Revathi et al., 2013); along with anti-inflammatory and wound healing activity (Kumar et al., 2009). It has mosquitocidal activity against Aedes aegypti (Choochote et al., 2005). However, documentation of its utilization as a larvicidal agent against Cx. vishnui group has yet not been put forwarded. This is the first ever report in this regard.
1 Materials and Methods:
1.1 Collection of plant material
The rhizome of C. aromatica was collected around the vicinity of Jaldapara (260 37’43” N, 89022’39” E), West Bengal, India. Following proper identification of the plant, a voucher specimen (GCZSM-3) was acquiesced as a herbarium to the Mosquito, Microbiology and Nanotechnology Research Units, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan.
1.2 Rearing of larvae and colony set up
Larvae of Culex vishnui group were collected from inundated rice fields of agriculture farm, The University of Burdwan (23°16´N, 87°54´E) by standard scooping and dipping method (Robert et al., 2002). They were kept in dirt-free plastic trays filled with tap water and were fed with a mixture of brewer yeast, dog biscuits and algae in 3:1:1 ratio (Kamaraj et al., 2011). Pupae were transferred from the trays to insectaries (45×45×40 cm). Adults were provided with 10% sucrose solution with multivitamin syrup in a container with a cotton wick. The mosquitoes were taxonomically identified with the help of the keys provided by Christophers (1933), Barraud (1934) and Chandra G (2000). On the day 5 of nurturing, a blood meal from a non-motile shaved pigeon was given to adults (females) overnight. Afterwards Petri dishes filled with 100 ml of tap water and wrinkled with filter paper were kept inside the cages for oviposition. The eggs were kept undisturbed and endorsed to hatch under laboratory conditions. By repeating this method, a laboratory reared colony of Cx. vishnui group was developed. The colony was set aside in a hygienic place and sustained at 30±2°C temperature and 8085% relative humidity (RH) under a 13:11 light-and-dark cycles.
1.3 Processing of crude extract
Collected fresh rhizomes of C. aromatica were firstly chopped to standard sizes and were rinsed in tap water followed by distilled water and soaked on paper towels. The dirt-free pieces of rhizomes were crushed by the electrical grinder and the fluid was filtered through Whatman no.1 filter paper. Thereafter the filtrate was used as a stock solution (100% concentration) and the desired concentrations (0.02%, 0.04%, 0.06%, 0.08% and 0.10%) were prepared for further bioassay experiments.
1.4 Solvent extraction
Cleaned rhizomes of C. aromatica were shed dried. 200 g dried rhizomes of C. aromatica were placed into the thimble of the Soxhlet apparatus and 2 litters solvent was loaded (1:10) into the still pot. Six different solvents viz. petroleum ether, n-hexane, ethyl acetate, chloroform: methanol (1:1 v/v), acetone and absolute alcohol from non-polar to polar fashion were passed through the column one after another with the same plant materials. The extraction period was fixed for 72 h (Ray et al., 2014, Bhattacharya and Chandra, 2014, 2013, Rawani et al., 2009) for each solvent with 8 h maximum a day. The extractives were collected from the still pot chamber and concentrated through evaporation. The fully concentrated extractives were kept at 4°C in a refrigerator for further use.
1.5 Larvicidal bioassay
The larvicidal bioassays were executed following the standard protocol of World Health Organization (WHO, 2005) in the Mosquito, Microbiology and Nanotechnology Research Units, Parasitology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan. Twenty five larvae of each instar were put in sterilized glass Petri dishes (9 cm diameter/150 ml capacity) filled with 100 ml of distilled water. Crude extracts of 0.02%, 0.04%, 0.08% and 0.10% concentrations were added separately to different Petri dishes. From each extractive five different working solutions of 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 ppm were prepared and applied on different Petri dishes for the assessment of the larvicidal property. Each experiment was triplicated (n=75) with 3 replicates of controls at laboratory condition. After 24 h, 48 h and 72 h of post exposures larval mortality were recorded.
1.6 Test on non-target organism
The effects of all the extracts were tested on Chironomus circumdatus and Gambusia affinis.Those were collected and maintained in cemented tanks in the laboratory. The median lethal concentration of 3rd instar larvae after 72 h of exposure was applied on the non-target organism.
1.7 Statistical analyses
Abbott’s formula (Abbott, 1925) was used to precise the percentage mortality (%M) throughout the observation. Estimations of LC50 and LC90 values through Log-probit analyses and regression analyses were carried out using the STAT PLUS 2009 (Trial version)and MS EXCEL 2007 respectively. ANOVA analyses were also done for further statistical justifications.
2 Results
The mortality percentages for all the instars with crude extracts of different concentrations were presented in Table 1. Maximum mortality was recorded at 0.1% concentration of the crude extracts. Among all the solvent media ethyl acetate showed positive result only. After 72 h of exposure, 1st, 2nd and 3rd instars larvae exhibited 100% mortality at 60, 80 and 100 ppm concentrations respectively. For 4thinstar larvae, 90.67% mortality was recorded in 100 ppm following 72 h of post exposure (Table 2). LC50 and LC90 values (at 95% level of confidence) were given in Table 3 which was noticed to decrease along time (from 24 h to 72 h).

Table 1 Dose response larvicidal bioassay using crude extract of C. aromatica rhizome against Cx. vishnui group

Table 2 Dose response larvicidal bioassay using ethyl acetate extract of C. aromatica rhizome against Cx. vishnui group

The mortality (Y) was positively concurrent with the concentration of exposure (X) with regression coefficient (R2) close to 1 in each case(Table 3). However the non-target populations were fairly nonresponsive throughout the observations. The larvicidal activity was found statistically significant (p < 0.05) through completely randomized ANOVA analyses (Table 4).

Table 3 Assessment of LC50 and LC90 values of ethyl acetate extract of C. aromatica rhizome through log-probit and regression analyses

Table 4 Completely randomized three way ANOVA analyses using concentration (C), hour (H) and instars (I) as three independent parameters

3 Discussions
Owing to hazardous impact of synthetic insecticides on public health, employment of ecological and recyclable natural insecticides of plant origin has been given importance. Larval control is regarded as the best approach to lessen up the mosquito populations at very early stage. Hence, management of mosquito populations is predominantly inclined at wrigglers’ control andonly against matures when essential. Miscellaneous plant ingredients were reported to be larvicidal (Bhattacharya et al., 2014a, 2014b, Ray et al., 2014), pupicidal (Rawani et al., 2012), adulticidal, smoke toxic and repellent (Chowdhury et al., 2007) against different species of mosquitoes.
Present study well documented the bio-activity of ethyl acetate extracts of wild turmeric against Cx. vishnui group. The larvicidal activity of crude extract of leaves of Swietenia mahagoni against Cx. vishnui group was reported by Adhikari and Chandra, 2012 where cent percent mortality of 3rd instar was recorded at of 0.4% concentration after 72 h of post exposure. In the current study 84% mortality of 3rd instars were noticed after 72 h of post exposure with 0.1% concentration only. The biocontrol efficacy of ethyl acetate extract of seed coat of C. sophera against Cx. quinquefasciatus was established by Kundu et al., 2013 with 100% mortality at 480 ppm concentration against 1st instar larvae after 72 h of exposure. The present study relates 100% mortality of 1st instar larvae at 60 ppm concentration only after 72 h of post exposure. So, the larvicidal effect of the C. aromatica was considerably higher (p < 0.05) at relatively lower concentration of the active fraction than their work. Elango et al., (2009) accounted that ethyl acetate extract of the leaves of Aegle marmelos (L) displayed larvicidal properties against 4th instar Anopheles subpictus and Culex tritaeniorhynchus with the LC50 values of 167.00 and 99.03 ppm, respectively after 72 h of exposure. The LC50 value of the 4th instars larvae was found 39.13 ppm after 72 h of post exposure in this present study (Table 3) against Cx. vishnui using ethyl acetate extracts of C. aromatica rhizome.
Concisely, the findings of the present study disclosed that the rhizome of C. aromatica exhibit notable larvicidal activity against Cx. vishnui group. Further investigations are needed to enlight the actual chemical amalgam accountable for larvicidal activity, to identify the chemical individuality of the active constituent and to fruitfully make use of, if feasible, by articulating a trade product.
Conflict of interest statement
We declare that we don’t have any conflict of interest.
The authors are indebted to Professor Dr. A. Mukhopadhyay, Department of Botany, The University of Burdwan, for his kind help in plant species identification. We are grateful to UGC DRS and DST-INSPIRE for providing financial assistance.
Abott WS., 1925, A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide, J. Econ. Entomol., 18(2): 265-267
Adhikari U., Singha S., Chandra G., 2012, In vitro repellent and larvicidal efficacy of Swietenia mahagoni against the larval forms of Culex quinquefasciatus Say, Asian. Pac. J. Trop. Biomed., S260-S264
Banerjee A. and Chandra G., 2004, Role of some factors on the breeding of JE vector Culex vishnui group, J. Commun. Dis.,36(4): 260-263
Barraud PJ., 1934, The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma, Diptera Vol -IV. Taylor and Francis London: 1-455
Bhattacharya K., and Chandra G., 2013, Bioactivity of Acyranthes aspera (Amaranthaceae) Foliage against the Japanese Encephalitis Vector Culex vishnui Group, J. Mosq. Res., 3(13): 89-96. doi: 10.5376/jmr.2013.03.0013
Bhattacharya K. and Chandra G., 2014, Phagodeterrence, larvicidal and oviposition deterrence activity of Tragia involucrata L. (Euphorbiaceae) root extractives against vector of lymphatic filariasis Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae), Asian. Pac. J. Trop. Dis., 4 (Suppl 1): S226-S232
Bhattacharya K., Burman S., Nandi S., Roy P., Chatterjee D. and Chandra G., 2014, Phytochemical extractions from the leaves of Ravenala madagascariensis from Sundarban area and its effect on southern house mosquito (Culex quinquefasciatus Say (1823) larvae, J. Mosq. Res., 4(12): 1-6 doi: 10.5376/jmr.2014.04.0012
Bhattacharya K., Chandra I., Kundu P., Ray S., Halder D. and Chandra G., 2014, Larval control of Culex vishnui group through bio-active fraction of traveller’s tree, Ravenala madagascariensis Sonn. (Strelitziaceae), J. Mosq. Res., 4(15): 1-6. doi: 10.5376/jmr.2014.04.0015
Chandra G., 2000, Mosquito, Sribhumi Publication Co., p 1-102
Choochote W., Chaiyasit D., Kanjanapothi D., Rattanachanpichai E., Jitpakdi A., Tuetun B. and Pitasawat B., 2005, Chemical composition and anti-mosquito potential of rhizome extract and volatile oil derived from Curcuma aromatica against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae), J. Vector. Ecol., 30(2): 302-9
Chowdhury N., Bhattacharjee I., Laskar S. and Chandra G., 2007, Efficacy of Solanum villosum Mill. (Solanaceae: Solanales) as a biocontrol agent against fourth instar larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus Say,Turk. J. Zool., 31(4): 365-70
Chowdhury N., Chatterjee SK., Laskar S. and Chandra G., 2009, Larvicidal activity of Solanum villosum Mill (Solanaceae: Solanales) leaves to Anopheles subpictus Grassi (Diptera: Culicidae) with effect on non-target Chironomus circumdatus Kieffer (Diptera: Chironomidae), J. Pest. Sci., 82: 13-18
Christophers SR., 1933, The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma, Diptera Vol -V. Taylor and Francis London: 360
Elango G., Rahuman AA., Bagavan A., Kamaraj C., Zahir AA. and Venkatesan C., 2009, Laboratory study on larvicidal activity of indigenous plant extracts against Anopheles subpictus and Culex tritaeniorhynchus, Parasitol. Res., 104(6):1381-1388
Kabilan L., Rajendran R., Arunachalam N., Ramesh S., Srinivasan S. and Samuel PP., 2004, Japanese encephalitis in India: An overview, Indian. J. Paediatr., 71: 609-15
Kamaraj C., Bagavan A., Elango G., Zahir AA., Rajakumar G., Marimuthu S., Santhoshkumar T. and Rahuman A., 2011, Larvicidal activity of medicinal plant extracts against Anopheles subpictus & Culex tritaeniorhynchus, Indian. J. Med. Res., 134(1): 101-106
Kumar A., Chomwal R., Kumar P. and Sawal R., 2009, Anti inflammatory and wound healing activity of Curcuma aromatica salisb extract and its formulation, J. Chem. Pharma.Res., 1(1):304-310
Kundu M., Rawani A. and Chandra G., 2013, Evaluation of Mosquito Larvicidal Activities of Seed Coat Extract of Cassia sophera L., J. Mosq. Res., 3(11): 76-81
Leisnham P., 2013, Taking a bite out of mosquito research, (
Rawani A., Ghosh A. , Laskar S. and Chandra G., 2012, Aliphatic Amide from Seeds of Carica papaya as Mosquito Larvicide, Pupicide, Adulticide, Repellent and Smoke Toxicant, J. Mosq. Res., 2(2): 8-18. doi: 10.5376/jmr.2012.02.0002
Rawani A., Haldar KM., Ghosh A. and Chandra G., 2009, Larvicidal activities of three plants against filarial vector Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae),Parasitol. Res., 105: 1411-1417
Ray AS., Bhattacharya K., Singh A. and Chandra G., 2014, Larvicidal Activity of Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. (Nymphaeaceae) against Anopheles stephensi (Liston 1901) and its Effect on Non-target Organisms, J. Mosq. Res., 4(10): 1-7
Revathi S. and Malathy NS., 2013, Antibacterial Activity of Rhizome of Curcuma aromatica and Partial Purification of Active Compounds, Indian. J. Pharm. Sci.,75(6): 732-735
Robert V., Goff GL., Ariey F. and Duchemin JB., 2002, A possible alternative method for collecting mosquito larvae in rice fields, Malar. J., 1:4. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-1-4
World Health Organization, 1992, Vector resistance to pesticides. Fifteenth report of the WHO Expert Committee on Vector Biology and Control, WHO Tech. Rep. Ser. 818: 1-62

World Health Organization, 2005, Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides. WHO, Geneva WHO/CDS/WHOPES/GCDPP/13 pp

Journal of Mosquito Research
• Volume 4
View Options
. PDF(479KB)
. Online fPDF
Associated material
. Readers' comments
Other articles by authors
pornliz suckporn porndick pornstereo . Subrata Mallick
. Kuntal Bhattacharya
. Goutam Chandra
Related articles
. Curcuma aromatica
. Rhizome
. Culex vishnui
. larvicidal activity
. Email to a friend
. Post a comment